‘Baahubali: The Conclusion’ is a nice movie but there are places where the message of ‘women empowerment’ feels like a joke.
1. Devasena, who epitomizes a strong, independent woman, says things like, “Why are you hiding in the back like women?” In other words, she wants men to stop acting like women (women=weak). This is a classic example of internalized misogyny.
2. The arrows of Devasena have a pink color on them while the arrows of Amarendra Baahubali have blue color. This is a classic example of gender stereotyping.
3. At the end of the day, Devasena has no identity of her own. Just like Avantika in ‘Baahubali: The Beginning’ (click), Devasena begins her journey as an independent, strong woman but is ultimately defined by her relationship with men (girlfriend, wife, mother). It is all about Baahubali, his kingdom, his child, his strength and his revenge.
IPL is a wonderful tournament but it is disappointing to see only female cheerleaders on the sidelines. There is nothing wrong with cheerleading…The problem is sexism (why can’t we have male cheerleaders)? By having only female cheerleaders, we are telling a generation of girls that they are only supposed to ‘cheer’ for men. Aren’t women expected to do this in every area of life? While the man reaches milestones in his career, the woman is supposed to sacrifice her dreams and ‘cheer’ for his achievements.
I am currently reading a book called ‘Everyday Sexism’. I didn’t want to test or judge anybody..that was not my intention (Okay, okay, I was judging people a little bit). But somehow, the book has gained popularity amongst my colleagues. It slowly became an experiment…I began to understand others by the way they reacted to the book on my desk. Here are some of their reactions:
Colleague 1: What is this book? OMG..’Everyday Sexism’ (in a mocking tone). It’s pretty deep, huh?
Colleague 2: Everyday Sexism..what is this about (this person seemed genuinely curious)
Colleague 3: This person just looked at the book, looked at me and went away
Colleague 4: ‘Baap re’ expression
Colleague 5: WTF expression
I guess I will be soon labelled a ‘Feminazi’ 😀 (I am a feminist and I don’t care if it is an uncool thing).
Deifying mothers is dehumanizing them. Human beings are entitled to be imperfect and it is cruel to expect them to sacrifice everything for others. If you really love your mother than stop expecting her to be selfless. Instead, embrace her flaws and her dreams.
Homemakers are expected to work without any pay because according to society, “the work is done out of love and money exchange shouldn’t happen in matters of love”. And yet, society doesn’t have any problem in measuring love and companionship when it comes to dowry. What happens to “love” when it puts out matrimonials with numbers like height, weight etc?
What do you think when you see a woman with body hair? After nearly two years of experiments (at my previous workplace), I have found some answers. According to most people, a woman/girl with body hair is:
1. from a small town who has no idea about beauty and grooming
2. a lesbian
3. a freak
The most interesting point of view is related to the second one: some people think it is okay for a woman to have body hair as long as she is a lesbian. In other words, it is important for a heterosexual woman to get rid of body hair because men like women who shave. What’s sad is that my experiments were not extreme: I didn’t show off my unshaven legs and I didn’t wear sleeveless tops with unwaxed underarms. What bothered my colleagues was just a little bit of hair on my forearms (that was the only visible body hair in my experiments). While some people were shocked, some gave me weird looks. Fortunately, the body hair didn’t bother them after some time.
I must admit that I was not always comfortable during these experiments. There were times when I couldn’t handle the pressure. My intention was not to make a statement against waxing or shaving. There is nothing wrong with getting rid of body hair but what’s wrong is people bullying those who choose not to.
I have a new job now and my plan is to continue with the experiments. Through these baby steps, I want to bring a change in the way people look at women and their bodies. It’s difficult because there is so much of stigma surrounding body hair. It is risky because women are judged by these things at workplaces. But I hope I will succeed in changing few perceptions.
Today, I joined women and men in the #Iwillgoout nationwide protest march against the Bengaluru molestation incident, sexual harassment, misogyny, sexism and rape culture. In Mumbai, women and men of all ages met at Veer Kotwal Udhyan in Dadar. The organizers are a bunch of spunky and passionate women who are on a mission to smash patriarchy. We all sang songs, held placards, chanted slogans and listened to people’s experiences. My favorite moment of the evening was listening to the author of ‘Why Loiter’ (Click), Ms. Shilpa Phadke, who is a professor at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences. The other memorable moment was singing a song written by popular feminist Kamla Bhasin.
Do candle marches and protests like these change the system? Not really. But they start a conversation, which is a beginning of change. It is important for women to meet and talk about sexual harassment and safety. Today, I realized that women meeting at a public place can be a political statement. Going out can be a revolution. Yes, the world outside is not safe. But as one of the people at the march said, we are not even safe at home. In the words of Ms.Phadke, women should be allowed to take risks by going out. For that, we need safe public places, hygienic toilets and many other facilities.
In ‘Why Loiter’, the authors make a strong case for aimless wandering on the city streets. While the focus is on Mumbai, the insights are universal.
As women, we are taught that loitering is not a feminine thing. Women in public spaces are expected to demonstrate a purpose (waiting for a friend, getting back from work etc). By loitering, women challenge the stereotypes and the label of a ‘good girl’. However, it’s not easy for women to loiter because the public spaces are designed in a way that discourages women from going out.
The authors have written the book with an aim of including all kinds of women. Differently-abled women, wealthy women, lesbians and women from the lower economic class find their place in the research on public spaces. Phade, Khan and Ranade don’t just highlight the problems; they have some innovative solutions to combat the problem of women’s safety in public spaces. The only issue with the book is that the authors often end up saying the same thing again and again.
If you are shaken after reading about what’s happening to women in this country, then this book will help you understand the root of the problem.
Ayqa Khan (click) is a Pakistani American artist who creates body positive art and shares it on social media platforms. One of the most recurrent themes in her work is the depiction of body hair on women’s bodies. We live in a society where it is obligatory for women and girls to get rid of their body hair. Even men are getting waxed these days but for women, hair removal is a MUST. And if you happen to be a woman with facial hair, then you will be bullied and treated like an alien. That’s what happened with Harnaam Kaur, who has a beard. In an environment like this, we need artists like Ayqa, who challenge conventions.
While looking at Ayqa’s art, I was transported to my teenage days when I wanted my mother to be like other mothers. Unlike most mothers, she never talked about waxing with me, mainly because the concept didn’t exist in her family. Now that I have grown up, I feel lucky that she didn’t pressurize me! I’m glad that she didn’t condition me. There is nothing wrong in getting rid of body or facial hair. What’s wrong is shaming someone who chooses not to. The next time you stare and mock a woman with body hair, ask yourself if you would do the same to a man. The question might open up a new worldview.
Few months after I started this blog, I started reading a lot of feminist articles. After understanding gender inequality, I decided to use ‘he/she’ instead of ‘he’ in almost all my blog posts. Initially, I was afraid of disappointing the readers. I didn’t and I don’t have a LOT of readers but there are some whom I value and I didn’t want to waste their time by adding more words to my already lengthy posts. On Facebook, I was afraid that my friends won’t read my posts because of this decision. But I stuck to my decision and I’m glad I made that choice. In some posts, I have to use a lot of pronouns and in that case, I have used ‘he’ and ‘she’ alternatively.
I cannot change the world but I can change the little things that I do everyday. Writing ‘He/She’ is not as revolutionary as revolting on the streets to demand voting rights for women but in a way, it is similar. Speaking up against sexist WhatsApp jokes is not as revolutionary as challenging the Sati tradition but in a way it is connected. By writing ‘he/she’, I’m asking the readers to invest a little more time and urging them to be conscious of language and how it has shaped our world. He/She is my small way of challenging the patriarchy.
I’m aware that there are people out there who do not identify with any gender. Instead of he/she, they want others to address them as ‘they’ (if I am not wrong). If you are one of those people, then I want to apologize because I don’t have adequate knowledge about the ways of addressing you and what I should be avoiding while interacting with you. Please correct me in the comments and I will definitely rectify my mistake.